Corentin Denolly vs Quentin Gueydan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L L W L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Denolly 1 - 0 Gueydan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Denolly winning 2 and Gueydan winning 0. The last match between Denolly and Gueydan was at the Rennes Challenger, 20-01-2020, Q3, I.hard with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
| Quentin Gueydan | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Quentin Gueydan
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:58:20 | Average Match Time | 0:58:20 |
| 59% (22/37) | 1st Serve % | 46% (25/54) |
| 68% (15/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 40% (6/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 63% (34/54) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Gueydan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Egor Novikov
Player
Quentin Gueydan
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Quentin Gueydan
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/244) | Win/Loss | 50% (66/65) |
| 60% (899/597) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (142/143) |
| 54% (7517/6429) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1328/1322) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1995 | Aces Total | 249 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1880 | Total Double Faults | 294 |
| 1:26:42 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 497.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 355.03 |
| 65% (26358/40557) | 1st Serve % | 51% (2393/4732) |
| 67% (17769/26358) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1619/2393) |
| 49% (6917/14200) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1023/2339) |
| 45% (2077/4609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (162/390) |
| 43% (17548/41198) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1657/4360) |
| 63% (409/647) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (65/130) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (14/27) |
| 60% (114/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (64/58) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (64/6) |
| 21% (259/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (67/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
